Tucker’s
experiment with the new blood-glucose sensor ended Friday. The ‘cap’ that held
the sensor in his skin was coming loose, and since the monitor that read it had
to be returned to the veterinary hospital within six hours of the last reading (otherwise
the information recorded would be lost), I decided to take it in on Friday. If
the cap had come off during the night, or when the hospital was closed, it
would have been an open question of getting the monitor back to the doctor in
time.
Even
so, the experiment was a success. I expected a telephone call from Tucker’s
doctor on Monday or Tuesday. She and her colleagues must have been eager to see
what the device would tell them, because I received a call from her Saturday
afternoon (when the hospital was actually closed).
She
was very pleased with the results. They gave a very full picture of Tucker’s
diabetic management over a week’s time. (I will be handed a print-out of the
results when I am next at the hospital.) For the most part, what they show is
very good. The roly poly had good to excellent ‘curves’ in relation to his
insulin injections, the diabetes responding as it should. Wednesday, however,
showed very high numbers with very little response to the insulin. This was
followed by a drop to low numbers, too low for insulin to be administered.
This
has happened in Tucker’s history of diabetes, rarely, but more often in recent
times than previously. The fact that most of his ‘curves’ are satisfactory or
better proves that he is not insulin-resistant, as some cats become. This is a
relief in itself. But how to account for the times that show no response to the
insulin?
The
doctor questioned the injection sites for the insulin. I almost always give
Tucker his injection in the same places: on either flank, usually; just through
habit, within an inch or two of the same spot. This has been going on for
years. While theoretically there is nothing wrong with this, it can cause
scar-tissue to develop, which will inhibit, not the insulin itself, but its
delivery. In other words, it might be having difficulty getting through a
callus.
The
solution suggested by the doctor is simple: selection of another spot on
Tucker. I can inject the insulin in the scruff, the tummy, or another location.
If I move it after some time, it likely won’t permit for scar-tissue. This may
not be the answer (because a callus may not be the question), but it is a
likely solution to the mystery, and easily applied.
Even
with these lapses, the doctor is very pleased with Tucker’s diabetic
management, and very pleased with the new sensor and how it worked. I am, as
well. Not only did it provide an excellent depiction of my cat’s situation but
it gave scope for a concrete response to a problem.
I
asked questions regarding the sensor. I wondered how it gathered blood samples
for reading the numbers. I thought it tapped into the capillaries just beneath
the skin. It does not. It samples the sugar in the subcutaneous flesh and,
using a formula in its miniature computer, translates the numbers it reads into
the equivalent that would come from blood. Rather ingenious, I think.
In
theory, there is no reason why a cat can’t have one attached to him all the
time. It cannot remain in the same place, as natural feline movement and the
re-growth of shaved fur will cause its detachment. But another may be applied
in another location. Practically, not every cat-owner will favour such a
policy, and, for the time being, the veterinarians see the sensor as something
used to study a cat’s diabetic routine, and to help clarify problems. Even in
this capacity, I feel that the new device is a success.
I
can foresee, in the not distant future, a smaller, flatter item implanted under
a cat’s skin, lasting six months, a year, or longer, giving the owner the peace
of mind that comes from knowing instantaneously what his little one’s numbers
are, and if there is a problem; giving a ‘curve’ without fuss or discomfort.
For
now, the experiment is ended, with good news all around. Tucker has a little
bald patch on his right shoulder for now, but, aside from licking it periodically,
it troubles him as little as did the cap itself. The doctor is happy with how
my guinea pig is doing; I am, too. And so, I think, is the guinea pig.
Good job Tucker. One of my work colleagues has such an implant and says it is awesome as she does not have to stick herself several times a day. As you say there may come a day when a smaller more viable implant may become available for pussy cats.
ReplyDeleteJulie and Poppy Q
Brilliant news! HeHe! Guinea pig..?
ReplyDeleteHe'll be twitching his nose next! :).
As l was reading this, l thought to
myself, why can't it be fitted under
the skin..humans have things fitted
under the skin for various reasons..!
Still..he looks quite content laying
there on the carpet..Bless him..!x
What most excellent news for Tucker! And I do believe that is the reason for the anomaly that always puzzled you...a callus! The Vet was thinking out of the box to come up with that! Perhaps not. I wouldn't have thought of it. I am glad you have another method now . In future, not seeing the curve unaffected if you change location, will certainly be the confirmation. Smooches on Tucker for his part of the job well done!
ReplyDeleteNever thought I'd see Tucker become a pioneer in the world of veterinary science. :)
ReplyDeleteI'm pleased to hear everything went well. When they perfect this device, it'll really be a boon to diabetic cats.
Terrific news! I'm glad there was a probable reason for the high/low readings, one that seems logical to me. Really, the advances in medicine are amazing. I would think that since a microchip is implanted permanently (though Derry's has travelled down his back some distance), this kind of device could be too, at some point in the near future.
ReplyDeleteGive Tucker a scritch and snuggle from me, tell him what a good cat he is. :-)
I hadn't thought of the micro-chip implanted for identification purposes. You're right, of course. That's exactly the sort of thing that may be next for this diabetic sensor.
DeleteHurrah!
ReplyDeleteGreat job Tucker, it worked out quite nicely with good results. We always gave insulin in the scruff here.
ReplyDeleteI am not sure I am mentally equipped to monitor a cat for diabetes. You
ReplyDeleteare a good cat owner to have the desire and ability to help your pets
live the best life they can. I never thought about the test prick sites or the injection sites that might callus over. Tucker's results sound encouraging.
That is very good news, and a callus makes perfect sense, so let's hope that is what caused the abnormal readings.
ReplyDeleteIt seems Tucker's experiment was a success all around. Not only were Tucker's glucose results good, the experiment proved that the sensor worked well. Hopefully this will make diabetic management for cats much easier in the future.
ReplyDeleteThat is great news about Tucker.
ReplyDeleteTucker is on the cutting edge of a new technology that could be a game-changer!
ReplyDeleteWell done!
Very good news! I'm glad it provided some useful information to help with the management of his diabetes.
ReplyDeletecatfather; we iz buzzed happee yur expera mint wented sew well; may bee one day a dee vize that lastz longer will bee available for cats; rather like de "patch" sum peepulz can now uze...we give ya 984 paws UP for bein willin ta try thiz, dad two; one all wayz haza bit oh hesitation with "new" stuff....ya look good dood, wear yur bald spot proud !! :) ♥♥
ReplyDeleteIndeed, the Catfather did very well, and wasn’t bothered much at all by the experiment. He performed quite a service for felinity.
DeleteWe are really glad that his numbers are stable except for the odd reading and injection site is most likely the issue but it could also be needle placement in the SQ space also. (There were nurses I worked with whose patients always had odd numbers and it was due to how they injected. Training stopped the issue. Just something to think about) Thanks to Tucker for helping others.
ReplyDelete